lobicube.blogg.se - Graphicconverter vs photos mac

#Graphicconverter vs photos mac movie
#Graphicconverter vs photos mac full
#Graphicconverter vs photos mac plus

Other multiple-image features include synchronization across devices via Dropbox's Camera Uploads as an alternative to iCloud, and automatic display of your Flickr, Locr, or Google Plus photostream, but not SnapFish, ShutterFly, or other sites. The menu for creating a web-based catalogue has six well-packed tabs for setting options, but the defaults should be good enough for most purposes.

#Graphicconverter vs photos mac movie

You can open files from the Finder or, preferably, from the app's built-in browser that displays previews and image information, and makes it easy to construct slide shows (with an option to export a slide show as a movie file) or build image catalogs for printing or for web pages. The latest OS X technology is built-in, including an Auto Save option for saving multiple versions of a file, and a Share button that sends images to Twitter, Facebook, e-mail, and more.

#Graphicconverter vs photos mac full

For the full range of adjustments the app makes possible, you'll need to go to the over-crowded top-line, with about twenty items each on the Picture and Effects menus, including three different red-eye correction tools. An "Adjust" button on the toolbar at the top of the editing window leads to basic controls such as brightness, contrast, sharpness, and a few others. Getting Started The editing interface looks a lot like other graphic-editing apps, with a floating toolbar with two dozen buttons controlling pencil and brush tools, text boxes, a lasso, eyedropper, rubber stamp, and more. And if you need to work with old or Windows-only image formats, GraphicConverter may be the only OS X app that gets the job done. For example, plenty of utilities can create custom icons for OS X, but most of them create only old-style low-resolution icons, while GraphicConverter can export icons in Apple's latest high-resolution formats for iOS or OS X.

You can find almost all of GraphicConverter's features scattered among other apps, but you won't find all of them anywhere else in one convenient package-and you may not find them in up-to-date form. Apple used to bundle a copy with OS X when you bought a new Mac, but that was before Apple released iPhoto, which has some of the same features as GraphicConverter, but not enough for anyone who works with non-standard formats or wants to do more than iPhoto's editing features can manage.

Best Hosted Endpoint Protection and Security SoftwareĪ Bit of Background GraphicConverter has been on the market since 1992, always adding features and conveniences.

I don't expect it to do Layers, and I don't like the way it does Text, but basic cropping and scaling should be a given. I have been reading the forums here for quite some time and I don't recall much mention of GC not doing a good job within its range of features. However, I hate to think of how many of my photos may not look as good as they could have because I processed them in GC instead of Elements. GC has been my default viewer and I guess it will remain as a viewer. Either way, they are both 'low end' programs. You can say it's a one hundred dollar program, but I wasn't willing to pay that price and I guess a lot of others wouldn't either or Adobe wouldn't have had to discount it so heavily. (Version 4.8.2 which I used for the comparison came built-in on my Powerbook, but I don't think that makes it any less expensive of a program.) I bought Elements from Amazon last summer for a net of $30 when they had some sort of special rebate deal going on. I have been using GC since August '01 when I paid $35 for it. And since it's range ofįunctionality is not exactly the same as Photoshop, the twoĪpplications still merit their place on your computer.

Given that Graphic Converter is a lot less expensive than PhotoshopĮlements, no it doesn't stink.